Re-membering
From Margeret Heath’s Re-membering · reconstructed by AI
Question 4 of 6 · The change
What will we change?
The change, and what it should lead to.
- Statements
- 20
- Connections
- 18
- Open questions
- 7
How to read it. Read from the bottom up: from each change to the effects it should have.
Part 2 of 4
Tools that people can inspect, change and stop
Visibility and privacy safeguards must be backed by actual authority to change the tool. More meaningful choice is a prediction; surveillance is a possible harmful branch and privacy protection is an untested remedy.
Draws on Margeret Heath (documents).
Outline
- Desired effectPeople retain meaningful choices and agency over how tools regulate them.From Margeret Heath
- Possible harmAdaptive tools may expose personal information or enable surveillance.From Margeret Heath
Beyond this part · 6 links
- People retain meaningful choices and agency over tool regulation. contributes to Being-with may become a lived practice that people evaluate and revise. in “Bring support, choice and adaptability together”
- Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override. is meant to address Adaptive technologies anticipate needs without meaningful shared control. In the way
- Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override. is meant to address External systems increasingly shape people's attention and choices. In the way
- Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override. is meant to address People's capacity to choose and learn can be narrowed. In the way
- Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override. put into practice by The selected tool is visible, contestable and reversible. First steps
- Limit data collection and provide privacy, override and accountability. put into practice by The selected tool is visible, contestable and reversible. First steps
Part 3 of 4
How interaction can change capacities and purposes
Reciprocal adjustments may generate coordination that changes capacities, expectations and subsequent participation. Some surprise may open new meanings or purposes. Novelty can also overwhelm or harm; this is not a recommendation to increase uncertainty. The loop is an AI inference to examine in a concrete activity; timing and power remain open.
Draws on Margeret Heath (documents).
Outline
- Desired effectPeople may become more able to adapt together under uncertainty.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ contributes to
- Predicted effectParticipants may revise what they notice, value and try as their interactions develop.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ contributes to
- ↑ contributes to
- Predicted effectEmerging coordination may reshape participants’ capacities, expectations and ways of relating to their surroundings.From Margeret Heath
↺ feeds back to Engage in a shared activity by noticing how bodies, other people, tools and environments respond, and adjusting together.
- Predicted effectEmerging coordination may reshape participants’ capacities, expectations and ways of relating to their surroundings.From Margeret Heath
- Predicted effectParticipants may revise what they notice, value and try as their interactions develop.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ contributes to
Beyond this part · 6 links
- People may adapt together more readily under uncertainty. contributes to Being-with may become a lived practice that people evaluate and revise. in “Bring support, choice and adaptability together”
- Notice how bodies, others, tools and environments respond, and adjust together. is meant to address Institutions favour predictability and targets over responses from the wider system. In the way
- Notice how bodies, others, tools and environments respond, and adjust together. is meant to address Surprise and variation are suppressed rather than explored. In the way
- Notice how bodies, others, tools and environments respond, and adjust together. is meant to address Responses can become brittle when conditions change. In the way
- Notice how bodies, others, tools and environments respond, and adjust together. is meant to address An intervention can meet its target while causing unintended harm elsewhere. In the way
- Notice how bodies, others, tools and environments respond, and adjust together. put into practice by Participants assess the pilot together and revise next steps. First steps
Part 4 of 4
Bring support, choice and adaptability together
The three routes meet jointly in a revisable practice of being-with. The muted statements show the other parts’ outcomes; none is presented as sufficient on its own, and the joint route remains incomplete and untested.
Draws on Margeret Heath (documents).
Outline
- Desired effectBeing-with may become a lived practice that people can evaluate and revise.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ contributes to all of these together
- Desired effectPeople retain meaningful choices and agency over how tools regulate them.From Margeret Heath
- Desired effectThe community may develop stronger relational support and capacity for repair.From Margeret Heath
- Desired effectPeople may become more able to adapt together under uncertainty.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ contributes to all of these together
Where this comes from
In the Logical Thinking Process this view is a future reality tree. How a commons works →