Changes

Rebalanced to 82 proposed statements and 66 proposed connections: the source account precedes the application, a reciprocal process loop makes emerging capacities visible, and assessment can revise purposes as well as actions. Earlier releases remain preserved.

• Added

  Added three attributed source-account observations and two predicted process effects, with a reciprocal coordination–capacity loop and a connection to learning. All remain proposed AI reconstructions or inferences.

  Heath treats selves and boundaries as formed through ongoing relations.Heath presents agency as reciprocal human and nonhuman activity and response.Heath treats some uncertain encounters as bringing forth meanings and possibilities.Reciprocal adjustments may produce unplanned shared coordination.Emerging coordination may reshape capacities, expectations and relations.and 4 connections
• Reworded

  Revised to make reciprocal process, emerging capacities and revisable purposes explicit.

  BeforePeople can learn from uncertainty and revise how they act together.

  After this releasePeople can let encounters with uncertainty reshape their capacities, shared purposes and ways of acting together.

  Uncertain encounters can reshape capacities, purposes and shared action.
• Reworded

  Revised to make reciprocal process, emerging capacities and revisable purposes explicit.

  BeforePeople have permission to explore alternatives and revise shared expectations.

  After this releasePeople can explore alternatives and renegotiate shared expectations as their situation changes.

  People can explore alternatives and renegotiate shared expectations.
• Reworded

  Revised to make reciprocal process, emerging capacities and revisable purposes explicit.

  BeforeAdjust actions by listening to responses from bodies, people and environments.

  After this releaseEngage in a shared activity by noticing how bodies, other people, tools and environments respond, and adjusting together.

  Notice how bodies, others, tools and environments respond, and adjust together.
• Reworded

  Revised to make reciprocal process, emerging capacities and revisable purposes explicit.

  BeforeVariation and surprise can become sources of learning rather than errors to suppress.

  After this releaseAttending to some surprises may reveal new possibilities for relating and acting, including reasons to reconsider shared purposes.

  Some surprises may open new possibilities and shared purposes.
• Reworded

  Revised to make reciprocal process, emerging capacities and revisable purposes explicit.

  BeforeFeedback can change what is tried next instead of preserving a fixed target.

  After this releaseParticipants may revise what they notice, value and try as their interactions develop.

  Interaction may change what participants notice, value and try.
• Reworded

  Revised to make reciprocal process, emerging capacities and revisable purposes explicit.

  BeforeMap the relationships, tools and routines that regulate people in the chosen situation.

  After this releaseTrace one concrete activity over time: how bodies, others, tools and places shape attention, coordination and possibilities for action.

  Trace how one activity changes attention, coordination and possibilities.
• Reworded

  Revised to make reciprocal process, emerging capacities and revisable purposes explicit.

  BeforeParticipants have a shared picture of what regulates whom.

  After this releaseParticipants have an initial account of reciprocal influences, timing and changing capacities in the chosen activity.

  Participants have an initial account of reciprocal influences and changing capacities.
• Reworded

  Revised to make reciprocal process, emerging capacities and revisable purposes explicit.

  BeforeAsk what helped, harmed or surprised participants, then revise or stop the changes.

  After this releaseAsk what helped, harmed or surprised participants, what changed in their capacities or purposes, and whether to continue, revise or stop.

  Review benefits, harms, surprises and changes in capacities or purposes.
• Reworded

  Revised to make reciprocal process, emerging capacities and revisable purposes explicit.

  BeforeParticipants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle using their assessments.

  After this releaseParticipants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle that can revise both the shared activity and its purposes.

  Participants can repeat a cycle that can revise shared activity and its purposes.
• Reworded

  Diagram label only: restored being-becoming to the displayed goal; the full statement is unchanged.

  BeforePeople flourish together while retaining autonomy and personal boundaries.

  After this releasePeople in a willing, bounded community can flourish through being-becoming with the world while retaining autonomy and personal boundaries.

  People flourish through being-becoming with the world, with autonomy and boundaries.
• Reworded

  Added two review entries and extended four. The source account, timing, practical relevance, conflict reconstruction and assessment of capacities and purposes remain open. Novelty can also overwhelm or harm.

  Heath treats selves and boundaries as formed through ongoing relations.People flourish through being-becoming with the world, with autonomy and boundaries.Shared settling may help some participants feel more able to be with others.Review benefits, harms, surprises and changes in capacities or purposes.and 2 connections
• Credited

  Acknowledged author feedback on an earlier map while retaining AI attribution and unendorsed standing for this revision. Private messages are not reproduced.

  Heath treats selves and boundaries as formed through ongoing relations.Heath presents agency as reciprocal human and nonhuman activity and response.Heath treats some uncertain encounters as bringing forth meanings and possibilities.

Expanded to 77 proposed statements and 62 proposed connections, with five original documents by Margeret Heath, a connected causal explanation, conflict, benefits and harms, readiness conditions and an act–listen–retune sequence. The first release is preserved; implementation approval does not endorse the reasoning.

• Added

  Added the missing structure across all six views: 59 statements and 51 connections, including the stability–participation conflict, three routes to improvement, harmful branches, readiness conditions and an illustrative feedback sequence.

  Uncertain encounters can reshape capacities, purposes and shared action.Consent is informed and revocable, with a trusted way to opt out.Supportive company and protected solitude are accessible.People attend to feedback across relevant timescales.People can explore alternatives and renegotiate shared expectations.Tool purposes are clear and people can override their operation.Affected people can govern changes to shared environments.Time is available for listening and repair.Reports of harm can receive a response that changes the practice.Regulation and wellbeing are treated as individual optimisation problems.Collective support and repair receive less attention.Surprise and variation are suppressed rather than explored.External systems increasingly shape people's attention and choices.People can become isolated and blamed for difficulties shaped by their surroundings.Strains and ruptures in relationships can remain unrepaired.Responses can become brittle when conditions change.The community sustains viable, flourishing relationships.People need stability and protection from overwhelm.People need adaptability, agency and opportunities to learn.Impose standardised individual regulation without shared control.Affected people shape and revise how regulation is organised.Combine reliable safeguards with shared control, alternatives and withdrawal.People may gain safer opportunities for voluntary co-regulation.Relational support and capacity for repair may become stronger.People can see and change how the tool shapes attention and routines.Some surprises may open new possibilities and shared purposes.People may adapt together more readily under uncertainty.Being-with may become a lived practice that people evaluate and revise.Adaptive tools may expose personal information or enable surveillance.Limit data collection and provide privacy, override and accountability.Protect solitude and declining participation without penalty.The group can judge and revise a practice and a tool's effects.No willing host or bounded situation has been agreed.A willing host agrees a bounded situation.Shared meanings of flourishing, agency and harm may be missing.Participants agree observable criteria for benefit and harm.Unclear arrangements may make participation coercive.Consent, withdrawal and harm response are usable.Protected time, space or repair roles may be missing.Time, space and repair roles are available.Tools may resist participants' inspection or control.The selected tool is visible, contestable and reversible.Shared evidence of benefits and harms may be missing.Participants assess the pilot together and revise next steps.Stress is discussed mainly as an individual problem.Trace how one activity changes attention, coordination and possibilities.Participants have an initial account of reciprocal influences and changing capacities.The picture lacks an agreed aim and participation arrangements.Agree desired effects, criteria, consent and ways to opt out.The pilot has a bounded purpose and usable participation criteria.Routines leave little protected opportunity for connection and repair.Offer an optional pause or check-in that people can change or leave.People have a voluntary chance to attune and a way to report strain.A tool anticipates needs in ways people cannot inspect or change.Review the tool and enable explanation, privacy and override.People gain awareness and practical choice over the selected tool.Benefits and harms remain uncertain.Review benefits, harms, surprises and changes in capacities or purposes.Participants can repeat a cycle that can revise shared activity and its purposes.and 51 connections
• Reworded

  Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope.

  BeforePeople can think and act together by tending the bodily, social and material conditions that support them, while retaining agency.

  After this releasePeople in a willing, bounded community can flourish through being-becoming with the world while retaining autonomy and personal boundaries.

  People flourish through being-becoming with the world, with autonomy and boundaries.
• Reworded

  Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope.

  BeforeFixed targets are pursued without attending to responses from the wider living system.

  After this releaseInstitutions prioritise short-term predictability and fixed targets over responses from the wider system.

  Institutions favour predictability and targets over responses from the wider system.
• Reworded

  Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope.

  BeforeTechnologies can shape people’s attention and routines around purposes they have not chosen.

  After this releaseAdaptive technologies anticipate people's needs without meaningful shared control of their purposes.

  Adaptive technologies anticipate needs without meaningful shared control.
• Reworded

  Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope.

  BeforeAssess tools by whether they widen people’s choices and whose purposes they serve.

  After this releaseMake a selected tool's purposes and effects visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and user override.

  Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override.
• Reworded

  Revised from an intermediate predicted effect to the desired outcome of meaningful choice and agency.

  BeforeTools can support chosen purposes while preserving people’s ability to question them.

  After this releasePeople retain meaningful choices and agency over how tools regulate them.

  People retain meaningful choices and agency over tool regulation.
• Reworded

  Reconnected the individual-burden and agency branches through their new mediating statements, and inserted variation and practical tool control into the learning and choice routes.

  and 4 connections
• Credited

  Added the supplied glossary and indexed bibliography. Margeret Heath is the sole credited source author across the five original PDFs. Source locators distinguish paraphrase, reconstruction and inference; primary studies have not been independently verified.

  People flourish through being-becoming with the world, with autonomy and boundaries.Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override.
• Reworded

  Preserved and revised the ten existing review entries and added nine. All reasoning remains proposed; no willing host, trial, assigned action owner, feedback commitment or outcome is established.

  People flourish through being-becoming with the world, with autonomy and boundaries.Regulation and wellbeing are treated as individual optimisation problems.The group can judge and revise a practice and a tool's effects.Review benefits, harms, surprises and changes in capacities or purposes.and 2 connections

The practical argument from three supplied companion documents, with 18 proposed statements, 11 proposed connections, page references and open review work. No participant endorsement, trial or outcome is recorded.

• Added

  AI reconstruction from the supplied slides, spoken script with notes and extended passages.

  People flourish through being-becoming with the world, with autonomy and boundaries.Participation in shared practices is safe, voluntary and open to withdrawal.People can notice strain and repair their shared rhythms.Tools and environments support purposes that people can question and change.The body is treated as a private machine to optimise and repair alone.Individuals carry a regulation burden shaped by relationships and surroundings.Institutions favour predictability and targets over responses from the wider system.An intervention can meet its target while causing unintended harm elsewhere.Adaptive technologies anticipate needs without meaningful shared control.People's capacity to choose and learn can be narrowed.Offer shared rhythms of rest and meeting that participants can adapt or leave.Agree how people can decline, raise harm and seek repair before a shared practice.Shared settling may help some participants feel more able to be with others.A shared practice may create pressure or make some participants feel less safe.Notice how bodies, others, tools and environments respond, and adjust together.Interaction may change what participants notice, value and try.Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override.People retain meaningful choices and agency over tool regulation.and 11 connections